🔗 Share this article

These times showcase a very unusual situation: the first-ever US parade of the overseers. Their attributes range in their skills and traits, but they all have the common objective – to avert an Israeli breach, or even demolition, of Gaza’s fragile peace agreement. After the conflict concluded, there have been few occasions without at least one of the former president's representatives on the ground. Only this past week saw the likes of Jared Kushner, a businessman, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all arriving to execute their roles.

The Israeli government occupies their time. In just a few short period it executed a set of attacks in Gaza after the deaths of a pair of Israeli military troops – leading, as reported, in dozens of local fatalities. Multiple officials urged a resumption of the fighting, and the Israeli parliament approved a initial measure to take over the occupied territories. The American response was somewhere ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

However in several ways, the Trump administration appears more concentrated on upholding the present, uneasy phase of the truce than on progressing to the next: the reconstruction of Gaza. When it comes to this, it appears the US may have aspirations but no specific strategies.

For now, it remains uncertain when the planned multinational governing body will effectively begin operating, and the same is true for the appointed peacekeeping troops – or even the composition of its members. On a recent day, Vance stated the US would not force the structure of the foreign unit on the Israeli government. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet keeps to refuse multiple options – as it did with the Ankara's offer recently – what occurs next? There is also the opposite question: who will decide whether the forces supported by the Israelis are even interested in the mission?

The matter of the timeframe it will take to demilitarize the militant group is just as vague. “The aim in the leadership is that the international security force is going to now assume responsibility in demilitarizing Hamas,” said Vance this week. “That’s will require some time.” Trump only emphasized the uncertainty, saying in an conversation a few days ago that there is no “fixed” schedule for the group to lay down arms. So, hypothetically, the unnamed elements of this yet-to-be-formed global contingent could arrive in the territory while the organization's fighters continue to remain in control. Would they be facing a governing body or a guerrilla movement? These represent only some of the issues surfacing. Some might wonder what the result will be for ordinary civilians as things stand, with Hamas continuing to attack its own opponents and critics.

Current incidents have once again emphasized the gaps of Israeli journalism on each side of the Gazan border. Each outlet seeks to examine every possible aspect of the group's breaches of the truce. And, typically, the fact that Hamas has been stalling the repatriation of the remains of killed Israeli captives has taken over the news.

On the other hand, coverage of civilian deaths in Gaza caused by Israeli operations has received scant focus – if at all. Consider the Israeli counter attacks following a recent southern Gaza event, in which a pair of troops were lost. While local authorities claimed 44 fatalities, Israeli news pundits criticised the “moderate response,” which hit only installations.

This is not new. During the past few days, the information bureau alleged Israeli forces of violating the truce with Hamas multiple times after the ceasefire was implemented, killing 38 Palestinians and harming an additional 143. The claim seemed irrelevant to the majority of Israeli media outlets – it was just missing. That included information that eleven members of a Palestinian household were lost their lives by Israeli troops recently.

Gaza’s emergency services stated the family had been attempting to go back to their residence in the a Gaza City neighbourhood of Gaza City when the vehicle they were in was attacked for allegedly crossing the “demarcation line” that marks areas under Israeli army authority. This boundary is unseen to the naked eye and appears only on maps and in government records – not always accessible to average individuals in the territory.

Even this incident barely rated a note in Israeli news outlets. One source referred to it shortly on its website, quoting an IDF spokesperson who stated that after a suspicious transport was identified, soldiers fired alerting fire towards it, “but the transport persisted to move toward the forces in a way that created an immediate risk to them. The soldiers shot to remove the threat, in compliance with the truce.” No injuries were reported.

Given this perspective, it is understandable many Israelis believe Hamas exclusively is to responsible for violating the truce. That belief risks encouraging appeals for a tougher approach in the region.

Eventually – maybe sooner than expected – it will not be enough for all the president’s men to take on the role of kindergarten teachers, telling the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need