🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard women from violence, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The final authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last year, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked widespread protest both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could potentially return the legislation for additional review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable debates in additional EU countries